No upload · No network · No storage — your ticks exist only in this page's memory and vanish on refresh. This page contains no code that makes a network request or writes to local storage.
Tick what they said to you
Close enough in meaning is fine; it does not have to be word for word. You do not need many — two or three is usually enough to identify the structure.
Nothing ticked yet
Tick any line above and this panel will show the closest structure and what that structure usually does next.
How the matching works
Each line is tagged with one structure; ticking counts them and the highest count is the closest match. There is no model and no scoring here — it is category counting, and saying so plainly matters, because a tool's description has to match what it actually does.
The five structures come from this site's own breakdown in the five shapes a crypto scam takes: sorted by structure rather than by name, because names are unlimited and structures are not.
| Structure | Core characteristic | What usually comes next |
|---|---|---|
| Relationship | Long build-up with no mention of money | An opportunity appears, with a small trial encouraged |
| Impersonation | Poses as official, support, or someone you know | A code is requested, or a transfer to a "safe account" |
| Approval theft | Steers you into signing or approving in a wallet | Assets moved later using the granted allowance |
| Yield promise | An uncertain return described as certain | Pressure to add, then withdrawal obstruction |
| Gate | Payment required to claim or withdraw | Payment made, next reason appears |
What it cannot do
Nothing ticked does not mean safe. Scripts are rewritten constantly and this list covers common forms, not all of them. The durable test is the four shared tells: it moves you off the official channel, it promises certainty, it compresses your time, and it ends with you handing over control.
Ticking something is not a finding about any person either. The same sentence can occur in an entirely ordinary conversation. This returns structural similarity, not identity. To assess a specific platform, the suspicious platform decision tree fits better; if money has already gone, go straight to the first 72 hours checklist.